Can you be penalised for putting too much under a constraint, providing it could be valid?
Example: in some of the Schweser papers, under Unique Circumstances the only comment/answer is "provide funding for daughters medical bills throughout her life, and she may outlive the parents". Within my answer I had listed several UC's such as "owns property outright" (which I'm sure I read should be considered), "medical bills covered for life" etc... To me these are valid answers?!
I'm planning to just include anything reasonable, but will the marker only look at the first one?
Example: in some of the Schweser papers, under Unique Circumstances the only comment/answer is "provide funding for daughters medical bills throughout her life, and she may outlive the parents". Within my answer I had listed several UC's such as "owns property outright" (which I'm sure I read should be considered), "medical bills covered for life" etc... To me these are valid answers?!
I'm planning to just include anything reasonable, but will the marker only look at the first one?